X-ray Group Virtual Journal Club

Entries tagged as ‘physics’

3D object reconstruction from random orientations

October 4, 2008 · Leave a Comment

The featured item this time is “Structure from Fleeting Illumination of Faint Spinning Objects in Flight with Application to Single Molecules” by Russell Fung and co-authors at U Wisconsin Milwaukee.

The promise of solving atomic-resolution 3D structure of biological proteins with X-ray Free Electron Lasers has several obstacles. First one is to have fast enough x-ray pulse to image molecules before it starts to undergo “Coulomb explosion”. But even that is not sufficient to produce atomic-scale structure due to low scattering cross-section of hard x-rays – so the experiment will need to be repeated many (thousands?) times to improve statistics. Luckily, protein molecules are identical, so the fundamental 3D structure of the sample could be considered the same – however, the orientation of protein molecule is going to be different each time.

There are two ways to solve the “random orientation” problem – one is to try to align the molecule, for example with a laser beam. However this has to be done with a very high precision and is difficult to achieve in practice. Another approach is to do experiment thousands of times with random orientations of molecules, catalogue all resulting projections, and then use mathematical algorithms to “fold” the projections into a unique 3D object that is consistent with all resulting projections.

Russel Fung et al. provide an algorithm that does just that – by simulating realistic conditions of 4th generation synchrotron source, X-ray Free Electron Laser, with collection of 100,000 photons, 72,000 repeated diffraction patterns from single shot experiments and scattering rates as low as 0.01 photons per pixel at large wavevectors corresponding to 1.8 Angstrom.

The result of folding using Generative Topographic Mapping for protein chignolin in random orientations is shown in figure above, for 3D movie of this reconstructed molecule see Abbas Ourmazd’s webpage at UW Milwaukee.

Categories: biology · coherent · ultrafast · xfel · xray
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

Why Ice is Slippery, Snowflakes and other regular December items

November 26, 2007 · Leave a Comment


December issue of Physics Today often features snow or ice related articles. A lot of them have to do with arguably the most misunderstood topic in physics – why ice is slippery? Generation of scientists were taught that skating on ice is possible due to lowering of melting point of ice under pressure, but this explanation is in fact wrong – one of the main reasons is premelting, existence of quasi-liquid layer coating the surface of a solid well below the melting point.

South Pole explorer Scott knew of this over a hundred years ago – below about 30 deg Centigrade ice ceases to be frictionless and skiing feels similar to skiing over rough sand. And the idea of premelting dates back to Faraday, who was arguing over origins of premelting with none other than James Thomson.

Here are some papers

J. Dash, “Between two and three dimensions” Physics Today, Volume 38, Issue 12, December 1985, pp.26-35

R. Rosenberg, “Why is Ice Slippery” Phys. Today Vol. 58 Issue 12 December 2005, p. 50

Y. Furukawa and J. S. Wettlaufer “Snow and Ice Crystals”, Phys. Today 70, December 2007, p. 70.

Gallery of snowcrystals

Explaining Ice: The Answers are Slippery, New York Times, Feb. 21, 2006

Dash, J.G., A.W. Rempel and J.S. Wettlaufer, “The physics of premelted ice and its geophysical consequences”, Reviews of Modern Physics, 78(3), 695-741, 2006

Categories: liquid-solid
Tagged: , , , ,